A former spokeswoman for the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has shared her opinion that a recent multi-billion dollar semiconductor funding bill that cleared the U.S. Congress earlier this week will prove to be insufficient when it comes to shaking up the semiconductor industry. The bill in question is the U.S. CHIPS Act, and it contains several provisions that promise government funding for chip companies that aim to either open manufacturing facilities in America or open centers for researching and developing new chipmaking technologies, particularly for nodes with feature sizes smaller than 3-nanometers. The spokeswoman’s comments came during a Twitter conversation held by Bloomberg Technology, in which she compared the size of the bill with TSMC’s capital expenditure to make the argument that it barely scratches the surface for establishing large-scale facilities.
Chip Subsidies Are Better Served As Investments In Materials and Research and Development Believes
The interview took place earlier this week and it saw representatives from Bloomberg Technology interview Ms. Elizabeth Sun who worked at TSMC for 16 years from 2003 to 2019, alongside the company’s founder Dr. Morris Chang. The conversation started off with Ms. Sun clarifying that since she is no longer working at TSMC, her views are not representative of the company and are simply her own opinions. She also praised her former employer and stated that when she joined TSMC in 2003, there was nothing but praise for the firm in the industry. Halfway through, she was asked which regions out the U.S., E.U., Japan and China have the best chance of developing a sturdy semiconductor industry. In response, Ms. Sun outlined that: Later on, she noted that while it was understandable that the U.S. government wanted to further boost its local chip manufacturing When asked whether global peace is necessary for a healthy chip industry, Ms. Sun agreed and responded by saying: But you say oh but because of geopolitical conflicts and so there are choking points in the SC. but SC is complex! As long as one element is missing this whole supply chain can be stuck, so it really doesn’t matter if you are just missing one element or if you’re missing a dozen or a hundred elements. All of you are stuck. So how can you be certain that at any given point in time everything you need is there domestically? That’s not realistic. That’s not realistic. So instead, you should work out collaborative models. The politicians should try to avoid too much conflicts among the world. She ended the conversation by stating that the chipmaking industry is a tough business to remain consistently profitable in and that the historic demand in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic had masked this fact on the firms’ balance sheets. She also added that it is nearly impossible for newcomers to catch up with the established players in the industry since the sector is extremely technologically and capital intensive.
